12/5/2023 0 Comments Wave one endo sequenceAvailable at: 5Cn 2011.ĭe Oliveira Alves V, Da Silveira Bueno CE, Cunha RS, et al. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Comparison of nickeltitanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. Available at speciality/clinical-resources/glossary-endodontic-terms/ Chicarho, American Association of Endodontists.2016. Glossary of endodontic terms: American Association of 16 > RESEARCH / SADJ Vol. Comparison of efficacy of three Ni-Ti instruments in removal of guttapercha from root canal during retreatment- an in vitro study. Available at: /wp-content/uploads/2019/01/DFUEdgeGlidePath.pdf. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. Shaping ability of WaveOne primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion. Investigation on the shaping ability of nickel–titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion. J Endod 2015 41:1939–50.įranco V, Fabiani C, Taschieri S, et al. Current assessment of reciprocation in endodontic preparation: A comprehensive review - Part II: properties and effectiveness. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by microcomputed tomography. Root canal shaping using nickel titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: a micro–computed tomographic comparative study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold instruments in maxillary first molars. Van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F, Vorster M, et al. Micro-computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the self-adjusting file, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper universal systems. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. All three groups evaluated in this study proved to be safe for the preparation of moderately curved root canals. Centering ratios and transportation values were more favorable in the apical region after use of TEF. Combined results showed that TEF was significantly moreĬentered than TWOG but similar to TOFG (P = 0.017). Apically, TEF remained significantly more centered with significantly lower transportation values than TWOG and TOFG (P < 0.05). Transportation values for TEF and TWOG were similar (P = 0.98) at the midroot level but significantly lower than TOFG (P = 0.04). Transportation values were similar at the coronal level and for the combined mean values (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in centering ratios at the coronal and midroot levels (P > 0.05). Pre- and post-preparation micro-CT scans were compared at levels 7 mm (coronal), 5 mm (midroot), and 3 mm (apical) from the apex to evaluate transportation and centering ratios. The canals were randomly divided into three groups for glide path preparation and shaping (n = 20): Group TWOG (WaveOne Gold Glider + Primary WaveOne Gold) Group TEF (Edge GlidePath + Primary EdgeOneįire) and Group TOFG (One File G Reciprocating Glide Path File + Primary Shaping file). Radiographs were used to select sixty untreated mesiobuccal canals with curvatures of 25° to 35° from extracted, human, mandibular molars. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare canalcentering ability and transportation of three analogous reciprocating shaping instruments after glide path preparation. Department of Odontology, School of Dentistry, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ĭepartment of Odontology, School of Dentistry, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |